UnkFM Is Playing : Love Story - Taylor Swift

unkster

Where Unkers over 30 sip Lavazzas, rave about Alfas and reminisce lost but not forgotten SoulmateS...

Tuesday, December 27, 2005

One Tree Does Not a Forester Make

Drool drool drool. I'm madly in love with the new Subaru Forester XT variant, all 2.5litres, turbo-charged 227bhp of it. After test driving one yesterday, I'm convinced I need to dump my 2 yr old lumbering Renault Megane2, which is fast becoming a blardy common runabout for balding middle-aged semi-geriatrics with Alonso-like aspirations :))



I need a reality check though. Its not going to be cheap and seriously, this vainpot doesn't REALLY have to change cars. Its a WANT, not a NEED!

Pros
1. The Subaru is one heck of a drive. Powerful and feels extremely planted around corners for a sizeable SUV. Will beat the RAV4s, CRVs and X-Trails at the lights anyday! heh heh!
2. With the added boot space, the wifey wants to add two more dogs to the family zoo.
3. We can re-live our off-roading excursions and go back to the days when we had our Pajero (at least I hope so but more on that later)
4. The dealership is throwing in a Thule roof rack upon purchase. Yummy.
5. The Forester is quite chng-able (hokkien-speak for Modify-able). Soon I can give it the 'aggro' treatment with a full frontal Bull-guard, sideskirts and a kick-ass bonnet air-scoop. I wanna unleash the Beng in me!
6. The 2-stage Sun-roof is fabulous and the SUV comes with a MoMo steering wheel, Cruise Control and side-mirror indicator lights as standard.

Cons
1. The petrol bill is going to kill me. Got to constantly feed the 2.5l turbo-charged engine and lug around 1.5tonnes of metal on permanent 4WD.
2. A significant jump in Road Tax
3. The Forester has definite off-roader looks but I suspect on-roader manners. I hope I don't have to be rescued by a Defender whilst in the mud.
4. It comes only with stock 16inch Yokohama All-Terrain Geolander tyres. The dealership will not have it upgraded to 17-inchers, saying it will alter the driving dynamics of the SUV.
5. The interior plastics and materials, although not cheapskate, gives you a typical Japanese tactile experience. And I'm so used to Conti.

Decisions decisions.....sigh :))

16 Comments:

Blogger kona said...

wrong peektures u dodo! hahahahaha....that's the previous forester there!!! :P

yep, big big jump....you'd be lucky to get 9km per litre...compare that to the 11 to 12km per litre you get (guesstimate) from the meg hor...

buy buy buy!!!! :))

5:00 PM  
Blogger FlyingMuffyn said...

oops, ur eyes so sharp can notice the grill differences ah :)) ok dis pic sure correct wan.

GUZZLER!!!! enuff said :))

5:19 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

wa! changing car liao? MTL! lol. i take over your M2 lah!

(yah right) :)))

9:48 PM  
Blogger FlyingMuffyn said...

dowan lah, M2 dun suit u. way too unker liao :))

5:10 AM  
Blogger kona said...

yep, now it's correct....of course i would notice....i like the car arma...but the new grill sipeh not shiok....maybe it'll be better as time passes....just like the buggyeye rex...

my main concern is the fuel consumption...with the rex already doing about 8 to 9km per litre on the 2L engine and this one become less slippery, heavier and with a 2.5L, you'd be damn lucky to do 7km per litre...it's a huge diff from the meg, my friend...

aiyah, not that you can't afford arma....BUY LAH BUY LAH!!!

then mod!!! MTL!! :))

9:23 AM  
Blogger FlyingMuffyn said...

aiyah it really all depends on how much i get offered for the M2. If its really dat pathetic (which I suspect it is), may have to shelve buying prans leh. either dat or consider the 2.0l non-turbo. but no sunroof! :(

10:16 AM  
Blogger unkster said...

how much is this thing?

10:34 AM  
Blogger kona said...

do you rrreeeaaaalllllyy need the turb???

if you really wan turb, go rex lah...79k :)

12:33 PM  
Blogger FlyingMuffyn said...

Forester 2.5 90k, 2.0 89k..and its not a THING unker curly ;))

and i dun reaaaaallllly nid the turb...is there anything in life besides air and water that u reaaaaalllllllly nid? :))

2:10 PM  
Blogger kona said...

i say get the rex! lagi benger ;)

i must say, the price diff between the turb and the non-turb damn little siah...if you have to choose between the turb and the non-turb, price should not be a factor...more the increased consumption, the increased roadtax and the lack of the sunroof...

8:21 AM  
Blogger FlyingMuffyn said...

salah salah me bad! 2.0 79K lah. 11k difference lah how can be 1k diff :))

12:55 PM  
Blogger kona said...

at 79k, get rex better...

1:05 PM  
Blogger princesslonglegs said...

diff la... rex is a performance car. forester more a lifestyle kinda car. personally i tink forester suits muff better. it's not everytime u test-drive a car and fall in love with it like like muff. moreover the rex is very common on the road now, he see common, one yr later, he wil itchy to change car again :))

1:26 PM  
Blogger FlyingMuffyn said...

dotter noes me best :)) i have an appt to testdrive the 2.0 tmr morning and have my renren evaluated for an offer

1:41 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

one thing escapes me... y does the guy of a DINK couple want to buy a SUV? i thought it's more for when u have a family (although only can sit 5) or something... but then again i guess i can't emphatise right now.

hehe..

8:18 PM  
Blogger FlyingMuffyn said...

yo teapot, its a SUV not MPV stewpit :))

12:16 AM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home